As a regular Alpine /Ayingerbrau drinker for 10 years I am gutted about the passing of Alpine. There is only one pub or club selling Sam Smiths near to where I live. When it was announced that Alpine would be reduced in strength to 2.8% they decided to change to Taddys. The club thought no one would drink 2.8% lager. So that was that. I tried Taddys and it was so sickly sweet I could not finish the pint. I've been diabetic for many years and don't eat or drink anything sweet. So I am probably over-sensitive to sugar or honey. Still the fact remains I found Taddys utterly disgusting and have been forced to drink Carling ever since. I regarded Alpine as the finest lager in the world and now it is lost.
I know that 2.8% Alpine (at least in bottles) is doing well. Very good, but why did we have to lose 4.5% Alpine? Couldn't we have both (one re-branded)? And then why was Alpine chosen for the drop in strength rather than Taddys? Most pubs/clubs will have only one Sam Smiths pump head and it will be Taddys, not Alpine. The new 2.8% Alpine should have been re-branded because people who order it thinking it is the old 4.5% that competes with Carling are going to feel very short-changed, and then switch immediately.
To me Taddys tastes like the most disgusting lager in the world. May be a lot of people like it. But I cannot stomach it,

no matter how many people tell me it is just the same. I can still taste that one pint of Taddys and I have no intention of ever drinking it again. And can't drink Alpine at 2.8% because no nearby pubs sell it, and I can't drink 4.5% Alpine because it is gone. So Sam Smiths won't get any of my 2,000 pints/year trade

and I'm very sad.

Don't say find 2.8% at the supermarket, because I am part of the dying breed that likes to go out, have a game of darts, or social chat with a pint or several at my pub or club. I don't drink in the house.
I'm surprised as to how many people do not know the reason for the switch to 2.8%, but it is reduced excise duty, so the lager can be sold at a much cheaper price.
http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/news-120911.htm