Well the link was active long enough for members to download it. But it does Shaw by the way the YouTube message read > I knew it was copyright, and should not have published it. Sure looks that Humph has his men watching this forum.
YouTube did say that I could fight the case. But why should a OAP with just a small private pension ever go that way,
What I don't understand the company who made the film had permission from Sam's, so they had the copyright. This company closed down in the 80's So how does SSOBB have the copyright?
Anyway as I've said, and members before, why should Samuels Smith shun this greater bublisaty.